Clean energy stocks jump after tax on solar and wind projects is removed from Trump’s big bill

Amidst the sweeping legislative initiatives emanating from President Donald Trump’s administration, significant proposed alterations to the federal State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction are at the forefront of policy debates, poised to impact taxpayers and the nation’s fiscal landscape. While initial reports might have focused on different aspects of a comprehensive bill, the detailed legislative maneuvers reveal a keen focus on the contentious SALT cap, currently set at $10,000. Senate Republicans have advanced a proposal that would dramatically lift this ceiling to $40,000 starting in 2025, alongside specific income phase-out thresholds, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse around federal budget and tax reform.

The $10,000 cap on the SALT deduction was a cornerstone of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, a measure that fundamentally reshaped the U.S. tax code. Prior to the TCJA’s enactment, the SALT deduction was effectively unlimited for taxpayers who itemized, though the alternative minimum tax often mitigated some benefits for high earners. The imposition of this cap created considerable pain points, particularly for lawmakers and constituents in high-tax “blue” states, who argued it disproportionately burdened their residents by curtailing their ability to deduct a substantial portion of their state and local tax burdens from their federal taxable income.

The Senate’s proposed legislation outlines a structured increase to the SALT cap, raising it to $40,000 from 2025, with a phaseout commencing for incomes exceeding $500,000. Both these figures are designed to incrementally increase by 1% annually through 2029, before the cap is slated to revert to its original $10,000 limit in 2030. In contrast, the House-approved measure, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, offers a similar $40,000 cap but extends this higher limit for a longer duration. While both bills aim to provide a degree of SALT relief, analyses suggest the Senate bill delivers a more substantial benefit, particularly when accounting for changes related to the alternative minimum tax.

Understanding the implications of these changes requires a brief look at how the SALT deduction functions within the broader tax framework. When filing federal taxes, individuals choose between taking a standard deduction or itemizing various deductions, including state and local taxes, medical expenses above a certain adjusted gross income threshold, and charitable contributions. The TCJA significantly increased the standard deduction, leading a vast majority—roughly 90% according to recent IRS data—to opt for the standard deduction. This means a relatively smaller segment of taxpayers, predominantly those with higher incomes and substantial itemized deductions, directly benefit from the SALT cap adjustments.

Consequently, the primary beneficiaries of a raised SALT deduction cap are undeniably higher earners. Beyond individual taxpayers, the Senate’s proposed legislation includes a critical provision protecting a SALT cap workaround for pass-through businesses. This mechanism allows owners of such entities to effectively bypass the $10,000 cap, a strategy that the House-approved bill would have curtailed for certain white-collar professionals. This distinction highlights a key area of divergence and contention between the two legislative chambers regarding the scope and beneficiaries of tax relief.

The proposed ‘deal’ has not been without its critics. Experts like Chye-Ching Huang, Executive Director of the Tax Law Center at New York University Law, have openly labeled it a “nonsensical approach to tax policy.” Huang argues that the legislation preserves—and merely lessens—a deduction limit for wealthy taxpayers while conspicuously ignoring loopholes that allow the wealthiest among them to circumvent the limit entirely. Such criticisms underscore the ongoing debate about the equity and effectiveness of current tax policy.

The path forward for this significant tax reform remains uncertain. The Senate’s legislation still requires approval from the House of Representatives, and it is unclear whether moderate House Republicans will endorse the proposed SALT deduction changes. The legislative journey reflects the complex interplay of political strategy, economic considerations, and differing philosophies on tax policy, with the final outcome poised to have notable implications for the federal budget and millions of taxpayers across the nation.